The COVID-19 pandemic has completely disrupted usual business practices and consumer behaviors, leading to a tremendous increase in chargebacks—and if you’re a business owner, it’s likely you’ve experienced this firsthand. While the travel and hospitality industry has been hit particularly hard due to increased travel cancellations, it’s certainly not the only industry that’s experiencing an increase in chargebacks: other factors such as inventory issues, shipping delays, and a spike of ‘friendly-fraud’ chargebacks filed by cash-strapped customers have affected merchants everywhere.

In this article, we’ll dive into several key factors that are contributing to the chargeback explosion during COVID-19, and share some practical steps that merchants can take to reduce negative outcomes. Plus, we’ll discuss some unique and timely circumstances in which cardholders actually do not have the grounds to dispute transactions.

A cashless ATM, otherwise known as point-of-banking technology, is a payment terminal that enables customers to make purchases with a debit card in the same way as they would make an ATM transaction to withdraw cash. The system was originally created as an alternative payment solution to serve high-risk businesses—such as legal medical marijuana dispensaries and certain types of “blacklist” businesses—that typically accept cash as the primary form of payment. Now, a variety of other types of businesses use this method of payment acceptance as well, including lunch trucks and vendors at farmer’s markets, for example.

In part 3 of Fidelity’s Effective Chargeback Management Series, we’ll be focusing on the chargeback reason code “Credit Not Processed”

Whether you call it Faster Payments, Immediate Payments, Instant Payments, or Fast Money, real-time payments technology has gained a solid foothold in the payment processing world.

In Part 1, we gave an overview of what chargebacks are and how merchants can respond to chargebacks with the reason code, “Product or Service Not Received or Merchandise/Service Not Provided.” In the next several installments in our series, we will continue to cover some best practices for even more chargeback types. This week we’ll focus on “Cardholder Claimed Not to Participate” chargebacks.

We’re excited to announce the launch of a new series that will provide valuable information about chargebacks and how business owners can best manage them to mitigate negative outcomes. In Part 1, we’ll be giving an overview of chargebacks and focusing on one chargeback reason code in particular.

Online merchants become more at-risk for online fraud each year, making fraud detection and prevention a vital component of successful business.

The average number of successful fraudulent transactions grew 32.1% in 2015, with retailers reporting an average of 206 fraudulent transactions per month compared to 156 in 2014. Retailer’s prevention efforts simply aren’t keeping up with the growth in fraud.

What most merchants don’t know is that there are some powerful tools that come with most payment gateways. These tools can be used to gather information about an order to make an informed decision about whether or not to process the payment and ship an orders that may be potentially fraudulent.

You’ve no doubt had this experience: you’re checking out at a store and are asked for your ID at checkout when you use a credit card, perhaps if the purchase is over a certain amount. You might even have a policy about this at your own store.

Is it legal for businesses to ask for ID?

Yes, it is absolutely legal. However, card networks have rules that stores must abide by when it comes to dealing with verification. These rules vary depending on whether or not a signature appears on the back of the card.

Visa & Mastercard’s policy is that if the card is unsigned, the merchant must ask that the card be signed and that the customer provide government ID. If the card is signed, the merchant is not allowed to require ID.

Visa’s policy is that “merchants cannot as part of their regular card acceptance procedures refuse to complete a purchase transaction because a cardholder refuses to provide ID.”  Visa’s advice to merchants: if a cardholder looks suspicious, the merchant should make a Code 10 authorization request call that alerts the card issuer to suspicious activity without alerting the customer.

“A merchant must not refuse to complete a transaction solely because a cardholder refuses to provide additional identification information,” says MasterCard.  It even has a special page on its website that cardholders can report to them when merchants do this.

Summer camps, snow removal and vacation services are only active for a small portion of the year. They require the ability to accept payments during those few months, but most processors  will charge them a monthly fee or have the merchant reapply each year. Is there a better option?

Come the seasonal merchant account, which is custom-made for this purpose. There is no need to pay unnecessary fees or waste time on the application process each year. Credit checks, which potentially lower one’s credit score, do not have to performed each year. Additionally, if a merchant had credit problems during the year, it could prevent the merchant account from being opened entirely, or force them to get set up with a more expensive service. Unfortunately, past processing history does not entitle a merchant to the same service in the future. A seasonal account prevents these issues entirely.

The seasonal account allows a merchant to “press pause” on their account as opposed to a “hard stop”.  This way, the account is ready whenever the business needs it and all that needs to be done is send the processor a re-opening letter.

However, there are several things to keep in mind:

An article by American Express offers some solid advice on precautions retailers should take to prevent losing business if unscrupulous customers claim they never received delivered orders.

Small businesses are generally hit hard by chargeback fraud. Aaron Press, Director, Payments & eCommerce for LexisNexis said, “We do know that small merchants invest less in fraud protection and are more likely to be defrauded because they have fewer ways to catch things in the process, And fraudsters know this.”

If your business receives too many chargebacks, aside from losing valuable, you can potentially damage your standing with the processing bank. If the chargebacks continue, you may even lose your merchant account and face difficulties finding another service provider.

Here are some tips on how to avoid chargebacks altogether: